[Foundation-l] strategic planning process update

Pavlo Shevelo pavlo.shevelo at gmail.com
Wed Sep 23 10:55:48 UTC 2009


Hello Ray,

> ... conflicts with the institutionalized deference implicit in Pavlo's
> question.

You understood my point perfectly well ;)
I have no personal reasons/causes to be ... 'suspicious' about WMF but
I'm from that part of the Earth where
> ... an essential mistrust of
> institutions ... beginning with governments.
is in blood of everybody.
So if some institution did not explain (publicly and in sufficient
details) some important future steps it is the sign (for me and alike)
that it's time to start asking questions ;) using
> The internet has provided tools for questioning
> institutions

Thank you very much for all your thoughtful  letter.
I do believe that further discussion about... 'relationships' (being
non-native speaker I'm in lack of better wording) between
community/'movement' and WMF (as main institution) should be essential
part of strategic planning process.

-- Pavlo Shevelo   <<[SUL & real name]




On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Ray Saintonge <saintonge at telus.net> wrote:
> Eugene Eric Kim wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Pavlo Shevelo wrote:



More information about the foundation-l mailing list