[Foundation-l] Licensing update vote result

[Anthony]

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:19 PM, effe iets anders
<effeietsanders at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> 2009/5/22 Anthony <wikimail at inbox.org>
>
>> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:12 PM, effe iets anders <
>> effeietsanders at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> 2009/5/22 Anthony <wikimail at inbox.org>
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Which way do neutral votes count on RfA?
>>> >
>>>
>>> 1) at which project (and please dont use enwiki abbreviations)
>>
>>
>> The important one (and why not).
>>
> Ah, meta? :) - seriously, i don't see why only to consider enwiki methods.
> Sure, most voters came from there, but this is an interwiki decision, where
> interwiki measures would make more sense.
>

In my opinion it shouldn't have ever been put to a vote in the first place,
so I guess I agree with you.


> But well, not that it matters anyway, these things should be decided
> /beforehand/ not afterwards.
>

50% was decided beforehand as the threshold for sending to the board.


> 2) does it matter? :)
>>
>>
>> Just wondering.
>>
>> I see from
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_bureaucratship/Riana/Bureaucrat_discussionthat they seem to be excluded from the %.
>>
> well, since those are about people, and this isn't, I dont see any
> relevance :P
>

Whatever.  I didn't ask the question for your benefit.


> Usually the two categories are treated differently.
>

As they should be.