[Foundation-l] Wikipedia is not the Kama Sutra, was Re: commons and freely licensed sexual imagery

[Birgitte SB]

--- On Fri, 5/15/09, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+wikilist at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+wikilist at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Wikipedia is not the Kama Sutra, was Re: commons  and freely licensed sexual imagery
> To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" <foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
> Date: Friday, May 15, 2009, 1:49 PM
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:40 PM,
> Birgitte SB <birgitte_sb at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Well you now snipped it all, but someone suggested
> creating mirror under a different domain name for schools.
>  I replied to that saying how I thought resources were best
> spent.  Then you replied to me.
> >
> > If you weren't replying to me to disagree with me, I
> have no idea what you intended.  But I thought disagreement
> with me was a pretty safe assumption from the tone of your
> message.
> 
> The beginning of my post was directed toward the general
> thread, and
> wasn't replying to anyone.  I don't normally top-post
> on mailing
> lists.  The part after the quote was replying to your
> specific point,
> and was supportive ("It would definitely be a good start .
> . ..").

I didn't see that there was anything besides the top-posted part. I am sorry for being careless about it and then making it a big deal :P  


Birgitte SB