[Foundation-l] Proposed revised attribution language

Michael Bimmler mbimmler at gmail.com
Mon Mar 16 20:53:24 UTC 2009


On 3/16/09, Chad <innocentkiller at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:09 PM, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2009/3/16 Geoffrey Plourde <geo.plrd at yahoo.com>:
>>
>>> 1.3 allows for the transfer to CC by SA, please stop playing semantics
>>
>>
>> Michael, could you please moderate Anthony? He's only here to spread FUD.
>>
>>
>> - d.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
>
> You're both cluttering our inboxes with your inane back-and-forth.
>

Indeed, I think both of you should just leave this thread alone.

Anthony, you have stated your opinion on the proposed license
migration quite pointedly. I am yet to find someone who agrees. So for
now I guess you can only watch what happens and, if you remain
disagreeing, sue the WMF. But stop trying to persuade us on this
mailinglist.

Michael

> -Chad
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>


-- 
Michael Bimmler
mbimmler at gmail.com



More information about the foundation-l mailing list