[Foundation-l] Attribution survey and licensing next steps

Milos Rancic millosh at gmail.com
Sun Mar 8 04:32:38 UTC 2009

On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Erik Moeller <erik at wikimedia.org> wrote:
> For example, if the survey had shown community credit to be highly
> desired and not controversial at all, that would be interesting: We
> could have an informed conversation about whether we should try to
> accommodate that model after all. As it is, it's the second most
> popular first option, but with 15.29% ranking it as their
> second-to-last option, it's also somewhat polarizing. A link to the
> article, on the other hand, is the first or second option for more
> than 60% of respondents, and the last or second-to-last option for
> only 3.47%.

Erik, this is not relevant because two options were non-options, so in
the opposite case third-to-last is also relevant. (Even it was good to
include them to realize how much Wikimedians care about their

More information about the foundation-l mailing list