[Foundation-l] Attribution survey and licensing next steps

Geoffrey Plourde geo.plrd at yahoo.com
Sat Mar 7 18:38:26 UTC 2009

Baseline, maybe?

From: Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 7, 2009 10:18:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Attribution survey and licensing next steps

2009/3/7 Erik Moeller <erik at wikimedia.org>:
> The author attribution survey is now closed. We have 1017 complete
> responses.  I've posted results of the attribution data in the
> following report:
> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:Attribution_Survey_Results.pdf
> I've posted the raw data of the attribution survey here:
> Respondents from English Wikipedia:
> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:Attsurvey-en.ods
> Respondents from German Wikipedia:
> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:Attsurvey-de.ods
> Respondents from miscellaneous languages and projects:
> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:Attsurvey-misc.ods


I'm curious, why did you include options that aren't actually
available? No credit and credit to the community are clearly not in
keeping with the license, so knowing who would accept them isn't
particularly useful (although I'm not sure it hurts).

foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


More information about the foundation-l mailing list