[Foundation-l] Why "Wikipedia" and not "the Wikipedia"?
Anthony
wikimail at inbox.org
Sat Jun 27 18:51:16 UTC 2009
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Anthony <wikimail at inbox.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Andrew Gray <andrew.gray at dunelm.org.uk>wrote:
>
>> (Perhaps Britannica gets it because "Encyclopedia" is a common word -
>> we'd feel silly with the sentence "I looked it up in Encyclopedia
>> Britannica", because "I looked it up in encyclopedia" would itself be
>> wrong)
>
>
> I don't have a problem with the sentence "I looked it up in Encyclopedia
> Britannica". In fact, after consideration, I'd say adding in "the" would be
> technically incorrect. Looking at britannica.com, EB consistently refers
> to itself without "the" in the beginning.
>
I'm sure there are quite a few other examples. The only one that comes to
mind, though, is "Best Damn Sports Show Period", and that one is treated
inconsistently even by the official websites.
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list