[Foundation-l] GFDL-only + OTRS
gerard.meijssen at gmail.com
Fri Jun 26 16:02:57 UTC 2009
Given that the GFDL is a viral license, it is not obvious that we should
accept GFDL only material.
2009/6/24 Pharos <pharosofalexandria at gmail.com>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:57 AM, David Gerard<dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2009/6/24 Pedro Sanchez <pdsanchez at gmail.com>:
> >> With the license move...
> >> do we still accept GFDL-only material?
> >> I've seen OTRSer today accepting and tagging entries released as GFDL
> > Is this images for Commons? I'd personally like to deprecate the GFDL,
> > but if it's a Commons-accepted free content licence then there's no
> > reason not to accept it.
> Of course, there are and always have been a wide range of free content
> licenses used for images on Commons, not just GFDL and CC.
> > - d.
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
More information about the foundation-l