[Foundation-l] Info/Law blog: Using Wikisource as an Alternative Open Access Repository for Legal Scholarship
saintonge at telus.net
Sun Jun 21 00:07:44 UTC 2009
Geoffrey Plourde wrote:
> If a bot has a meaningful effect on server load (i.e. page requests), it falls under the category of malicious software, which is highly illegal.
Malicious software or overloading servers goes well beyond ignoring a
ToS. Why should downloading whole books from Google have any greater
effect on server load than downloading a whole book of similar length
from Internet Archive?
> From: Ray Saintonge
> Brian wrote:
>> That is against the law. It violates Google's ToS.
>> I'm mostly complaining that Google is being Very Evil. There is nothing we
>> can do about it except complain to them. Which I don't know how to do - they
>> apparently believe that the plain text versions of their books are akin to
>> their intellectual property and are unwilling to give them away.
> How is violating Google's ToS against the law? Sites put all sorts of
> meaningless garbage into these documents, and users mostly ignore them.
> Of course Google's evil; it's about time that people noticed that. They
> use their deep pockets as a way to bully other sites ... with a smile.
> Fortunately the U.S. does not have database protection laws like the
> E.U. Ideally, every PD item they host should also be hosted on an
> alternative site, but that's a massive undertaking, ... and they know
> it. Nothing requires them to be nice to the competition, such as by
> making it easy to copy their material.
More information about the foundation-l