[Foundation-l] Licensing update roll-out
thomas.dalton at gmail.com
Thu Jun 18 17:13:58 UTC 2009
2009/6/18 Erik Moeller <erik at wikimedia.org>:
> 2009/6/18 Walter Vermeir <walter at wikipedia.be>:
>> When I look at the updated en.wikipedia.org and [[meta:Licensing
>> update/Implementation]] page I see that site footer only states that the
>> text is licensed under the "Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike
>> No mention anymore of the good old GNU/FDL.
>> Yes, there is the phrase;
> The GNU FDL does not apply to pages that import CC-BY-SA only content.
> We now already have a few examples of that with content imported from
> Citizendium. Because the GFDL is only of interest to a minority of
> re-users, and because it doesn't apply to all pages, and because
> re-users have to verify that it _actually_ applies on a per-page
> basis, I think it's completely appropriate to refer to the terms of
> use here rather than bloating up the site footer. People have to read
> the terms anyway to understand what's going on.
That seems reasonable to me, but I would say "alternative terms"
rather than "additional terms". Additional terms suggests you have to
follow them in addition to the CC ones, which isn't the case.
More information about the foundation-l