[Foundation-l] Wikimedia Commons: Service project or not?
geo.plrd at yahoo.com
Tue Jun 16 18:13:40 UTC 2009
"Its only point"=what is does=store images for other projects
I was not referring to the cabinet makers, just the filing cabinets. It was the closest metaphor for Commons my caffeine deprived brain could think of. Following along it, a cabinet maker is one who makes cabinets. The cabinets themselves are repositories.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Geoffrey Plourde <geo.plrd at yahoo.com>wrote:
> Commons is an oddball project. Other projects produce work, but Commons
> stores it. Wikisource could be considered another oddball for the same
> reason. At this point in time, I would class Commons as a service project
> (and wikisource as well) because it provides a service to other projects and
> its only point is to provide a service to other projects.
By "other projects", do you mean "other Wikimedia projects"? And how are
you determining what "its only point" is?
All Wikimedia projects are service projects in a sense.
Unfortunately, I can not fathom any reason that Commons should be or is a
> independent project in its own right. It would be like making all the filing
> cabinets in an office their own division.
Most cabinet makers are independent from the office where those cabinets are
I really don't see the dichotomy between independence and service.
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
More information about the foundation-l