[Foundation-l] Why don't we re-encode proprietary formats as Ogg?
Brian
Brian.Mingus at colorado.edu
Sun Jun 7 17:14:04 UTC 2009
How many people at WMF consider their opinion's to be "official" ? :)
I think there are two issues for a proprietary -> non-proprietary converter:
1. The conversion software itself must be FLOSS.
2. The format being converted must have an open specification (Flash being a
good example of one that might be allowed to be converted).
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:41 AM, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/6/7 Platonides <Platonides at gmail.com>:
> > David Gerard wrote:
>
> > Isn't Firefogg good enough? That's the solution being developed.
>
>
> Installing software is an extra step for the user, therefore bad.
>
>
> >> ** though I fully expect people will now do so anyway
>
> > IANAL but
>
>
> See, told you!
>
> Does anyone have an informed, official opinion on this matter?
>
>
> - d.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list