[Foundation-l] How was the "only people who averaged two edits a week in the last six months can vote" rule decided?

[Gerard Meijssen]

Hoi,
When we have consensus on that one, someone has to count them.. So what
piority do we give it and, what do we bumb down the list ? Alternatively who
is volunteering to write the necessary software anyway and how are we going
to get it operational ??

PS I like the idea <grin>
Thanks,
      GerardM

2009/7/31 Milos Rancic <millosh at gmail.com>

> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Ryan Lomonaco<wiki.ral315 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > The rules did disenfranchise me, for example.  It doesn't bother me that
> I
> > can't vote, but that said, I would've liked to vote if eligible.  I am
> not
> > active on Wikipedia, but I do follow the mailing lists, and have followed
> > the election process.  If I really wanted to, I could've racked up 50
> edits
> > to get a vote, but that almost seems "dirty", I guess, to make edits just
> to
> > regain eligibility for the election.
>
> I think that mailing lists posts should be treated as edits.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>