No subject

youngsters recruiting will be treated by elders  community members
like age discrimination increasing their discomfort in projects (like
Ukrainian) where they are in dramatic minority (that is their
percentage is much less than in country population)? I mean they could
decrease their contribution if not leave project instead of
evangelisation among friends and colleagues.  And what I'm saying is
not just my guesswork - I know many cases of such elders decisions.


On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Milos Rancic<millosh at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Pavlo Shevelo<pavlo.shevelo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> * ... Older age groups are not interesting
>>> anymore in the sense of quantity
>>
>> Are we really interested in quantity as that? Are we?
>>
>>> In other words, whatever we want or prefer, projects which hope that
>>> their main recruiting age is older than 30 -- are dead projects in the
>>> long run (i.e., if you are spending time of people in 30s to recruit
>>> people in 50s, who will spend time to recruit more people in 50s when
>>> those who are now in 30s will be in 70s?).
>>
>> :)
>> My point is not switch from "15-24" to "50+" age limits, but to object
>> narrowing of limits too much.
>> I mean that combining of several age diapasons could provide "best of
>> two worlds" result.
>>
>> And "recruiting" process should go as snowball - for example "50s"
>> should hunt for more "50s" (as "30s" seems not mature enough to do
>> that really well :) )
>
> I have to say a lot about this, but I'll try to be concise...