[Foundation-l] Article: Public Domain Art in an Age of Easier Mechanical Reproducibility (Sage Ross)

[teun spaans]

"the fact of the matter is that it is not the author that benefits from
copyright"

unfounded and untrue.

I wish you health and true happiness.
teun

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hoi,
> I had a read of the first one. While it is nice that there is an
> understanding that copyright has to do with authorship, the fact of the
> matter is that it is not the author that benefits from copyright. This is
> best understood in the way they define the types of copyright:
> *commercial
> *scholarly
>
> In this way it is forgotten that there is research by people who are none
> of
> the above. In this duopoly it is easy to give to companies what should not
> be theirs in the first place.
> Thanks,
>     GerardM
>
> 2009/7/13 Klaus Graf <klausgraf at googlemail.com>
>
> > There are much morer statements than by Hamma and Hirtle, see:
> >
> > http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/5405864/
> > http://hangingtogether.org/?p=692
> >
> > Klaus Graf
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>