[Foundation-l] About that "sue and be damned" to the National Portrait Gallery ...

Ray Saintonge saintonge at telus.net
Sat Jul 11 06:13:18 UTC 2009


Andrew Lih wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Thomas Dalton<thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> I don't know if there is precise precedent, but from what I've read I
>> think most people agree that "sweat of the brow" is, at least in some
>> cases, enough under UK law.
>>     
> I suppose we'd need a humidity reading from the room in which the
> photos were taken.
>   

 From that one might conclude that if the photos were taken during the 
winter there would be no sweat of the brow. :-)

Ec



More information about the foundation-l mailing list