Geen onderwerp

> Are you basically replacing the GFDL on Wikipedia with CC-BY-SA?
> 
>     No, we proposed that all content currently available under GFDL will also be made available under the CC-BY-SA license, and that all future revisions must be dual licensed, with the exception of CC-BY-SA-only additions from external sources. 


When I look at the updated en.wikipedia.org and [[meta:Licensing
update/Implementation]] page I see that site footer only states that the
text is licensed under the "Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike
License".

No mention anymore of the good old GNU/FDL.

Yes, there is the phrase;
"additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details."

But is that not a weasley way of saying it is actually dual-licensed and
also GNU/FDL?

That is not very Wikipedia style.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words

-- 
Contact: walter AT wikizine DOT org
Wikizine.org - news for and about the Wikimedia community