Mon Jan 19 21:31:31 UTC 2009
> Are you basically replacing the GFDL on Wikipedia with CC-BY-SA?
> No, we proposed that all content currently available under GFDL will also be made available under the CC-BY-SA license, and that all future revisions must be dual licensed, with the exception of CC-BY-SA-only additions from external sources.
When I look at the updated en.wikipedia.org and [[meta:Licensing
update/Implementation]] page I see that site footer only states that the
text is licensed under the "Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike
No mention anymore of the good old GNU/FDL.
Yes, there is the phrase;
But is that not a weasley way of saying it is actually dual-licensed and
That is not very Wikipedia style.
Contact: walter AT wikizine DOT org
Wikizine.org - news for and about the Wikimedia community
More information about the foundation-l