[Foundation-l] Sexual Content on Wikimedia

[Marcus Buck]

Sam Johnston hett schreven:
> Is it ever clear "that the depicted person agrees to the depiction"?

Well, it's not, but that's actually not a very useful point. I was never 
in Cameroon. I have never met anybody from Cameroon. I have never seen 
any obvious evidence that Cameroon really exists. And still I do not 
question that there is a place like Cameroon. Why? Cause people say so. 
If the uploader confirms that the subject of the image is not underage, 
has consented to the image and to the upload, that's no evidence, but 
it's still much more than requiring no confirmation at all.

We could require the uploader to give the name of the model for example 
(by OTRS, not on the wiki). We could require confirmation of age and 
consent, we could require an explicit identity by asking for a identity 
card number or anything like that. We should require at least 
_anything_. At the moment we assume good faith even if the probability 
for good faith is marginal.

Marcus Buck