[Foundation-l] Sexual Content on Wikimedia

[Marcus Buck]

geni hett schreven:
> 2009/1/30 Chad <innocentkiller at gmail.com>:
>   
>> Wouldn't a generic solution be more adequate? Certainly better than
>> going through all of the human anatomy.
>>
>> -Chad
>>     
>
>
> Not really. For example our need for portraits of people we have
> articles on means that we should have several hundred thousand images
> of faces.
>
> In addition most parts of the human anatomy don't have the same
> providence issues.
The issue is pictures of genitalia, isn't it? So "NoGenitalia" *could* 
be the thing you two are searching for...

Marcus Buck