[Foundation-l] Sexual Content on Wikimedia

Sam Johnston samj at samj.net
Fri Jan 30 00:22:21 UTC 2009


On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:39 AM, private musings <thepmaccount at gmail.com>wrote:

>
> This is a sort of 'essay spam' I guess, so for those aspects of this post,
> I
> apologise! I've also been criticised on some Wikimedia projects for
> proposing
> policy <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Sexual_content>,
> flooding
> and generally getting a bit boring about this issue, so I hope you'll
> forgive me one post to this list, on this issue.
> <snip>

I'd love to hear your thoughts :-)
>

Stop. Your latest proposal was comprehensively and unanimously rejected on
commons[1] and the previous attempt received a similar response on en.wp[2].
This post mixes unrelated issues (policy vs permissions vs deletions), looks
a lot like inappropriate canvassing[3], and it's not even clear that you
have any justification for your assertion about "hosting these images
without the subject's permission".

Thanks,

Sam

1. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Sexual_content#Oppose
2.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Sexual_content/old#Removed_this_yet_again
3.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Canvassing#Inappropriate_canvassing


More information about the foundation-l mailing list