[Foundation-l] Agreement between WMF and O'Reilly Media about Wikipedia: The Missing Manual on Wikipedia?

[Chris Down]

Well, either way, there's no harm in asking him to upload ones without the
watermark.

- Chris

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hoi,
> As far as I know, Commons has no such thing on watermarking. As always,
> come
> up with better illustrations and you can replace them. This is an
> extraordinary situation anyway... Wikipedia has also this other "rule;
> Ignore all rules.. A good one to apply for now.
> Thanks,
>     GerardM
>
> 2009/1/29 Chris Down <neuro.wikipedia at googlemail.com>
>
> > As a note, the images are watermarked, and I have notified the user. IUP
> > states that this should not occur.
> >
> > - Chris
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > 2009/1/28 Andrew Whitworth <wknight8111 at gmail.com>:
> > > > Wikipedia would have to write some kind of
> > > > special exception to every rule to allow this book to exist there.
> > >
> > > We already have the only exception we need: IAR. (That doesn't means
> > > Wikibooks wouldn't handle it better, though!)
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > foundation-l mailing list
> > > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>