[Foundation-l] Re-licensing

[Jussi-Ville Heiskanen]

Erik Moeller wrote:
>
> For example, if WMF decides that a guaranteed by-name attribution is
> not reasonable, scalable, and detrimental to the goals of WMF, it can
> responsibly tell people that. People who have made past edits could be
> given the option to have _those_ edits always attributed by name. The
> community could gradually factor out those edits if it considers them
> to be cumbersome.
>
>   

Let me just humbly ask you. Would it be detrimental to the
goals of the WMF, if people re-using WMF content could do
so in a way that would make the content impossible to use
in any jurisdiction where moral rights obtain?

I ask only in a search for clarity on this issue.


Yours,

Jussi-Ville Heiskanen