[Foundation-l] RfC: License update proposal
geni
geniice at gmail.com
Thu Jan 22 22:35:54 UTC 2009
2009/1/22 Mike Godwin <mgodwin at wikimedia.org>:
> Without defending the particulars of CC's phrasing, which I think has
> its problems but which I also think is better than you allow for here,
> I'll offer my opinion that a license a license without any vagueness
> or debatable terms is such a rarity that I don't think I've ever seen
> one.
>
>
> --Mike
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL is not far off.
In any case vagueness has it's uses since any attempt to try and
define everything will tend to result in the license either failing
or behaving in a very unhelpful manner under certain conditions.
--
geni
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list