[Foundation-l] Steward-Wahl

[effe iets anders]

Please note that stewards are not an electoral college. Although it is
positive if there are stewards around that have an understanding of a
project in case there is something complicated going on, there is absolutely
no necessity to have stewards from specific angles. It is not like stewards
come together and vote on something, there are no ratio's to be held.

Lodewijk

2009/1/20 Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml op gmail.com>

> 2009/1/20 Jan Luca <jan op jans-seite.de>:
> > Aber, wenn kein Steward von einen der Wikiversity-Projekte kommt und auch
> > keiner dort mitarbeitet, ist es schwer das Projekt zu beurteilen, da man
> > keinen "Live"-Mitarbeiter hat.
> >
> > Ich weiß, dass Stewards global sind und auf alle Projekte zugreifen
> können.
> >
>
> Yes, you are right -- it's best to have well-rounded candidates.  But
> in the end, stewards don't decide so they are just people to do the
> actions of the community.
>
> However, if you really want to get a Wikiversity candidate, the only
> way to do it is to encourage them to nominate themselves!  You have a
> few days left. :-)
>
> --
> Casey Brown
> Cbrown1023
>
> ---
> Note:  This e-mail address is used for mailing lists.  Personal emails sent
> to
> this address will probably get lost.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l op lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>