[Foundation-l] GFDL Q&A update and question

[Alex]

geni wrote:
> 2009/1/10 Anthony <wikimail at inbox.org>:
>>  It isn't clear what it means.
>> There seems to be a belief that it can be interpreted to only require
>> attribution of 5 authors, and I don't like that at all.
> 
> The word "five" doesn't appear in the license and "5" only appears in
> a section name and one reference to the section.
> 
> There might be a way to use one of the clauses to do this but it would
> be darn hard and the foundation has made statements that it won't use
> the relevant clause.
> 

Its actually the GFDL that has the "5 principle authors" thing, section 4.

-- 
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)