[Foundation-l] Simple English Wikipedia on xkcd

[David Goodman]

since that is the most recent xkcd, you may be thinking of the recent
http://xkcd.com/545/ "Neutrality Schmeutrality"
or http://xkcd.com/214/   "The Problem with Wikipedia"
or  http://xkcd.com/446/ "in Popular Culture"

not to mention the classic  http://xkcd.com/285/  "Wikipedian protestor"

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Dan Rosenthal <swatjester at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 24, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Al Tally wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:09 PM, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> http://xkcd.com/547/
>>>
>>>
>>> - d.
>>>
>>
>> Eh I'm sure this was discussed somewhere already... anyway, it
>> brought a ton
>> of new editors in, which was both good and bad (we desperately need
>> more
>> good editors, but not vandals!)
>>
>> --
>> Alex
>> (User:Majorly)
>
> That's good; considering that Simple had someone running on their 9th
> or 10th failed RFA with no intentions of giving up, it could probably
> use more than the same 15 people.
>
> -Dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>



-- 
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG