[Foundation-l] The reality of printing a poster

[Bence Damokos]

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Bence Damokos <bdamokos at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Sam Johnston <samj at samj.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:43 PM, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > 2009/2/3 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen at gmail.com>:
>> >> Hoi,
>> >> The economics of it are such that there is a real fine balance between
>> cheap
>> >> and expensive. I positvely hate text on my posters. Printing on the
>> back is
>> >> two prints and that IS expensive. My point has been and still is that
>> it is
>> >> nice to come up with "solutions". They have to be practical in the real
>> >> world. If a proposed solution adds enough overhead, the effect will be
>> that
>> >> it will not be accepted a solution.
>> >
>> > Assuming posters are not for large scale public display sending the
>> > credits on a separate bit of paper would probably meets the
>> > requirements.
>>
>> I'm not aware of any print-on-demand providers who facilitate the
>> sending of arbitrary documentation with prints so my ability to reuse
>> is still unnecessarily restricted.
>>
>> Sam
>
>
According to this [1], the  Wikiposter service on the French Wikipedia
provides attribution by printing a separate page with the license details.

In reply to Huib Laurens: is this the/a right way to attribute?


[1]
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projet:Impression/en#Frequently_asked_questions

Best regards,
Bence Damokos