[Foundation-l] Raw data of 2009 Board election ballots
Anthony
wikimail at inbox.org
Wed Aug 26 15:32:33 UTC 2009
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Svip <svippy at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/8/26 Anthony <wikimail at inbox.org>:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Tim Starling <tstarling at wikimedia.org
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Let me say for the record that I'm not at all happy with this data
> >> being released, since it allows vote-buying.
> >
> >
> > What's wrong with vote-buying? It's no worse than seat-buying.
>
> I am not sure I understand the logic in this comment.
>
> If something is bad; then it doesn't matter if something else is
> equally bad? And we shouldn't bother fighting either one unless we
> can fight both?
>
> Makes little sense to me.
You're adding in a "therefore" which I never intended. I don't have a
problem with seat-buying, so long as the current board approves of the
candidate, anyway. And in the case of a WMF election the current board has
the final say in whether or not to seat the candidate.
So you'll have to start by showing why seat-buying is bad. And then you'll
probably have to find a new foundation to support.
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list