[Foundation-l] Election Results

[Chad]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Pavlo Shevelo<pavlo.shevelo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't think so. "Your English is better than my <whatever>
>> language." is a honest response.
>
> Thank you, Milos, I appreciate your input.
>
> I meant another... aspect - like
>
>> Rough eligibility can be derived from edit histories. This is a bit
>> harder to calculate, though anyone with a toolserver account could do
>> this.
>
> ... meaning that:
> * I do believe that election comity should (if not have to / must)
> share statistic data which is in their possession
> as well as
> * I don't have (and never had) toolserver account
> etc.
>
> So
>
> {{Sofixit}}
>
> looks like more the "friendliness to newcomers" issue (for this
> mailing list and beyond) which is so popular in _discussions_ here
> last time.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Milos Rancic<millosh at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Pavlo Shevelo<pavlo.shevelo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> {{You're laughing on me }}
>>>
>>> :(
>>
>> I don't think so. "Your English is better than my <whatever>
>> language." is a honest response.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>

Well, the raw data is certainly available, but more involved
statistics will take someone with time and a computer to
do the number crunching. That was Greg's original point,
that anyone can use the data if they'd like, for whatever
statistical analysis suits your needs.

-Chad