[Foundation-l] Voluntary self-regulation of multimedia service providers

[private musings]

Well yeah Milos - but we probably won't - will we! - Seems a bit silly.

I was hoping we could have a thread about the principle of discussing /
evaluating some of the various voluntary codes of conduct out there -
perhaps someone is aware of a US standard (is that what you're getting at,
Geni - that the location of the servers is probably the most important
factor?)

cheers,

Peter,
PM.




On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Milos Rancic <millosh at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:21 AM, geni<geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2009/8/7 private musings <thepmaccount at gmail.com>:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Just wondering what folk think about the WMF heading towards compliance
> with
> >> things like this;
> >>
> >> http://www.gsmeurope.org/documents/eu_codes/fsm_code_en.pdf
> >>
> >> This is a german code of conduct - but there are many more (I've also
> spoken
> >> with these chaps =- http://www.iia.net.au/ - and I got the feeling that
> >> they'd very much like to engage with both communities, and the
> foundation as
> >> the 'service provider')
> >>
> >> My interest stems from discussing sexual content on wikimedia foundation
> >> projects, but obviously engagement with such external bodies / codes of
> >> practice etc. is far from limited to that sphere,
> >>
> >> best,
> >>
> >> Peter,
> >> PM.
> >
> >
> > Is based on German law so no. There are rather a lot of other flaws
> > but that one is a complete killer.
>
> We may consider to use Saudi Arabia and North Korea laws, too.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>