[Foundation-l] Frustration with the conversion engines issue
saintonge at telus.net
Thu Apr 2 07:49:03 UTC 2009
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Ziko van Dijk <zvandijk at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> I am sceptical about automatic conversion. As you said, it is mainly a
>> solution for reading, but not for writing, because the source text is in one
>> specific spelling or character system.
> Why couldn't that be converted on the fly as well? Choose one variant
> as the canonical one, and store only that in the database. Anyone
> wanting to use other formats would have the text in the edit box
> automatically converted to their preferred variant on the fly, and
> converted back when they saved.
When you declare one version canonical the risk is that you will have
supporters of the losing version(s) becoming irrationally angry.
More information about the foundation-l