[Foundation-l] more classical languages wikipedias approved by langcom and board of trustees.

[Gerard Meijssen]

Hoi,
Actually we do not say "no" a lot. What we do say a lot is "your language or
your proposal is eligible". We do say "no" when it is clear that a language
does not fit within the rules however, we often suggest how a proposal can
be changed to meet the criteria.
Thanks,
        GerardM

On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 4:12 PM, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2008/9/5 David Moran <fordmadoxfraud at gmail.com>:
>
> > *The Languages committee is usually pretty proud of the fact that since
> > they were created, not a single project that they've approved has died
> > or been closed as a failure. *
> > Huh.  I didn't know that.  That is pretty impressive, actually.
>
>
> Uh, this indicates their rules are *way* too conservative. It's easy
> to have no failures if you say "no" a lot.
>
>
> - d.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>