[Foundation-l] mo.wikipedia.org

[Gerard Meijssen]

Hoi,
One thing that all sides cannot agree on is that Romanian is also written in
Cyrillic.
Thanks,
      GerardM

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:12 PM, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2008/11/14 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>:
> > 2008/11/14 geni <geniice at gmail.com>:
> >> 2008/11/14 Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com>:
> >>> Why not just rename it ro-cyrl.wikipedia.org *right now* and be done
> >>> with it?
> >>
> >> Because the people who actually use it would not consider it Romanian.
> >
> > But the ISO standard that we use for these decisions does. From what I
> > can tell, it is Romanian pure and simple, people saying otherwise are
> > doing so for purely political reasons.
>
> This is true yes (well mostly anyway I think one thing all sides can
> agree on is that that Romanian is not written in cyrillic). However
> this argument would also requires us to merge the Central South Slavic
> diasystem wikis something I feel best attempted from a long way away.
> Neptune perhaps.
>
>
> --
> geni
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>