[Foundation-l] mo.wikipedia.org

[Michael Everson]

On 14 Nov 2008, at 11:30, Gerard Meijssen wrote:

> Because this is one of the most heavily fought battles that did not  
> result in a situation that is acceptable to all.

Well, since "mo" is now deprecated, re-naming it "ro-Cyrl" can be done  
without really taking any decision. It's essentially cosmetic.

> The issue is that the people behind the mo.wikipedia are not living  
> anywhere near the areas involved and they are not native speakers/ 
> writers either. It would have been good when this thing had been  
> just deleted because the pain would have worn off. However, the  
> decision was that when a native speaker comes along, it can be  
> restarted...

I don't understand. Is it to be deleted? Is it to be re-named? If not  
the former, then surely the latter.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com