[Foundation-l] GFDL 1.3 Release

Robert Rohde rarohde at gmail.com
Mon Nov 3 23:25:42 UTC 2008


On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Alex <mrzmanwiki at gmail.com> wrote:
> Robert Rohde wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:51 PM, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
>> <snip>
>>
>>> FAL and GFDL 1.2 only are not uploaded in large enough amounts that we
>>> cannot absorb the loss.
>>>
>>> GPL and LGPL are more of a problem
>>
>> </snip>
>>
>> On Commons, counting how many times each template is used.
>>
>> GFDL 1.2: 9000
>> GPL: 14000
>> LGPL: 7000
>> FAL: 17000
>>
>> I'm not sure your instincts that FAL and GFDL-1.2 are easier to deal
>> with are necessarily correct.
>>
>
> Does that include images dual-licensed under CC licenses? The
> dual-license template just includes both license templates in a fancy
> wrapper.

Yes.  My approach was very low tech, just counting what links here
from the template.  No effort to sort dual licensing or anything else
fancy.

-Robert Rohde



More information about the foundation-l mailing list