[Foundation-l] GFDL 1.3 Release

[Robert Rohde]

For the copyright geeks, I would like to point out that in addition to
the new section 11 there were also substantial changes to section 9
(the termination clauses) in this new version.  Other minor changes
includes a "proxy" clause in section 10 and a new definition for
"publisher" in section 1.

-Robert Rohde

On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/11/3 Erik Moeller <erik at wikimedia.org>:
>> 2008/11/3 Milos Rancic <millosh at gmail.com>:
>>> The idea of dual licensing is great. However, CC-BY-SA-only additions
>>> complicate situation a lot
>>
>> Being able to import CC-BY-SA content is one of the primary
>> motivations for re-licensing in the first place.
>
> I'd say allowing people to re-use our content under CC-BY-SA is the
> primary reason. Being able to import CC-BY-SA content is an added
> bonus (is there really much out there that we would want to use?
> There's some, sure, but I doubt there's enough to be worth the hassle
> of relicensing for it).
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>