[Foundation-l] Fwd: ISO 639 JAC decision re mo/mol

[Chad]

I would think the LangCom has the enduring responsibility of dealing with
all
projects/languages, pre-LangCom or not. Seems to me that language-related
issues are under LangCom :)

-Chad

On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hoi,
> Moldavian was created before the start of the language committee.. so no
> responsibility at all for the language committee; it was not involved.
> Thanks,
>      GerardM
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:52 PM, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 2008/11/3 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen at gmail.com>:
> > > Hoi,
> > > With the ISO 639-3 standard we have the best standard that is
> available.
> > It
> > > is the only standard that ties in with what we do; publish on the
> > Internet.
> > > When you know about the policies of the language committee, you would
> > know
> > > that it only expresses opinions about requests for new projects and
> > > languages. The question of what I personally find is not that relevant
> as
> > a
> > > consequence.
> > >
> > > I am not interested into our Moldavian issue per se, I have found and I
> > > still find that it is very much a political issue. An issue that has
> been
> > > dealt with by the closure of the wiki. When I look at how comparable
> > > situations were dealt with elsewhere, I am not impressed. Let it be
> clear
> > > that the mo code is still legal. It may still be used.
> > > Thanks,
> > >      Gerard
> >
> > So you are taking the collective responsibility route? Have the other
> > memebers agreed to this?
> >
> >
> > --
> > geni
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>