[Foundation-l] Community Assembly

[Chad]

Incorrect. If the Foundation get involved in /content/. There's a
distinct difference
between not being involved in content and not being involved in the community.

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Geoffrey Plourde <geo.plrd at yahoo.com> wrote:
> If the foundation gets involved in community issues, they aren't an ISP under Section 230
>
>
>
>
>  ----- Original Message ----
>  From: Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>
>  To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
>
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 12:47:18 PM
>  Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Community Assembly
>
>
> On 12/05/2008, Geoffrey Plourde <geo.plrd at yahoo.com> wrote:
>  > Meta is a project of the Wikimedia Foundation. If the remit is increased, Section 230 immunity goes to the birds.
>
>  Meta is a website run by the WMF. Section 230 is specifically about
>  making people that run websites not be liable for the actions of their
>  users. You're not making any sense...
>
>  _______________________________________________
>
> foundation-l mailing list
>  foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
>
>
>
>       ____________________________________________________________________________________
>  Be a better friend, newshound, and
>  know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>  _______________________________________________
>
>
> foundation-l mailing list
>  foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>