[Foundation-l] Community Assembly

[Dan Rosenthal]

What will make it unified? A mythical idea of consensus? What is  
consensus, as determined by the assembly? And what makes you think it  
would have any authority, after the board rejected the idea of giving  
the significantly better planned out Wikicouncil idea any authority?

-Dan
On May 12, 2008, at 12:01 AM, Geoffrey Plourde wrote:

> Unlike the Assembly, Meta is not an structured body. The Assembly  
> will serve as a unified community voice, not the meta aspects of  
> projects.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Pharos <pharosofalexandria at gmail.com>
> To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org 
> >
> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 8:15:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Community Assembly
>
>> From: Dan Rosenthal <swatjester at gmail.com>
>> What makes it any different than any current list or page?
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Geoffrey Plourde  
> <geo.plrd at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> As of this point the Community has no leadership body. This would  
>> step in and fill the void without disenfranchising the collective  
>> voice of the community.
>
> This sounds to me very much like meta.wikimedia.org.
>
> Thanks,
> Pharos
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
>
>
>       
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l