No subject

record of the discussions by topic. They also can be watchlisted so
updates to threads of discussion are more obvious and topics under
discussions can be completed sooner.

I agree that transparency is important for most of the work, but not all.

Some people are timid about making comments in public forums. If users
want to contact the group privately with idea or concerns, I would
like for them to be heard.

Sydney




On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Andrew Whitworth <wknight8111 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm neither interested in a private wiki nor a private mailing list
>  for this. I would be fine with a communications medium that was
>  read-only for non-members. We do want the community to know what we
>  are discussing, even if we take some measures to keep the noise level
>  down while we are discussing it.
>
>  Also, I agree with Chad that no wiki/list/whatever be set up until we
>  have board approval on a resolution to create a PVC in the first
>  place. Jumping the gun here is really not a good idea.
>
>  --Andrew Whitworth
>
>
>  On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Chad <innocentkiller at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > Until the Board decides either way on the (P)VC, there
>  >  should be no private wikis or mailing lists. If those of
>  >  you on Effe's shortlist want to congregate somewhere
>  >  off WMF-endorsed lists and wikis privately, that's your
>  >  own agenda, but to make a private list or wiki when
>  >  there's no official endorsement from the Foundation
>  >  is unacceptable. We already have a community paranoid
>  >  of "cabals" and "secret lists" as it is, and making one
>  >  on the official mailing lists without and Board approval
>  >  wouldn't help that paranoia in the least.
>  >
>  >  -Chad
>  >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>  foundation-l mailing list
>  foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>