[Foundation-l] A question for the Wikimania jury

[David Gerard]

On 31/03/2008, Austin Hair <adhair at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Dan Rosenthal <swatjester at gmail.com> wrote:

>  > That carries with it the implied statement that strong bids from such
>  >  places would have been unwelcome from the very start for 2009's
>  >  Wikimania, which is troubling. If that's not the case, please let me
>  >  know. I'm certainly not saying that BA had a weak bid; from what I've
>  >  seen of it, I don't think it was too bad. Were the jury to have
>  >  addressed the concerns regarding the high relative weight that
>  >  location has compared to it's actual level of importance when compared
>  >  to other factors, and still chosen BA on its merits, I'd be OK with
>  >  that; I just feel that those concerns were not addressed.

> That certainly wasn't implied, and I'm sure you know it.  Don't troll.


That's certainly precisely how it read to me. Don't call people trolls.


- d.