[Foundation-l] Stroop report

[geni]

On 23/03/2008, Newyorkbrad (Wikipedia) <newyorkbrad at gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems to me that common sense should be used in this as in all
>  other matters. A 60-year-old photograph that has never been the
>  subject of any claim of ownership and which has been repeatly used in
>  multiple media around the world without challenge is freely usable in
>  any practical sense.
>
>
>  Newyorkbrad

We however stick with the legal sense. Reason being that "practical
sense" has an annoying tenancy to turn out not to be and is way too
subjective.

-- 
geni