[Foundation-l] Ads and monobook

Geoffrey Plourde geo.plrd at yahoo.com
Sun Mar 23 01:58:34 UTC 2008


Actually has anyone started straw polls yet? 



----- Original Message ----
From: Florence Devouard <Anthere9 at yahoo.com>
To: foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 10:53:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Ads and monobook

Chad wrote:
> Let's assume projects can opt-out, and this must be approved
> by the Board (as they are ultimately responsible for fiscal
> matters). For the sake of arguments, let's pretend enwiki came
> to a fairly clear consensus that they wished to opt-out of WMF
> ads. Wouldn't this basically kill the entire ads cash-cow right
> there?
> 
> Now, continuing this scenario, I can imagine the Board would
> probably reject an opt-out from the largest project. This begs
> the question: does the Foundation see all projects in an
> equal light?
> 
> -Chad


That's an excellent question !

I am tempted to return it back first.

If all the languages were voting independently from one another, for 
opt-in or opt-out... how would you feel if en.wiki would vote for "no 
ads", whilst ja.wiki vote for "yes" ?
Would you rather consider the global project, or would you be willing to 
accept diversity ? Should it be a global decision, or a local one ?

I guess that a global decision would make the issue a "core principle"
whilst a local decision would make the advertisement issue a "mild 
principle".

ant


_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ


More information about the foundation-l mailing list