[Foundation-l] Volunteer Council - A shot for a resolution
Chad
innocentkiller at gmail.com
Mon Mar 17 17:24:18 UTC 2008
Thank you Ray. Exactly what I meant.
-Chad
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Ray Saintonge <saintonge at telus.net> wrote:
> Thomas Dalton wrote:
> > On 17/03/2008, Chad <innocentkiller at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Looks like a typo to me. Perhaps "could take" was meant? And
> >> on that note, our freedom /was/ removed, in a sense. The idea of
> >> membership was revoked some time back.
> >>
> > Yes, I meant "could take". I apologise to anyone offended by that
> > unintentional accusation.
> >
> > The idea of membership was revoked? I didn't think the foundation ever
> > had members, it was incorporated without them. What do you mean?
> In the scramble to compose an e-mail it's just as easy for Chad to use
> the wrong word as for you. :-)
>
> "Rejected" might be more to the point than "revoked"
>
> Ec
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list