[Foundation-l] Volunteer Council - A shot for a resolution

[Chad]

Looks like a typo to me. Perhaps "could take" was meant? And
on that note, our freedom /was/ removed, in a sense. The idea of
membership was revoked some time back.

-Chad

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hoi,
>  By using the past tense you indicate that they already have... is that your
>  intention and if so, how would you substantiate this ?
>
>  NB I am not interested in hearsay.
>  Thanks,
>     GerardM
>
>  On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>
>  wrote:
>
>
>
>  > On 17/03/2008, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > > Hoi,
>  > >  So who is going to say that they "screwed up" and why will their
>  > arguments
>  > >  ring true? Given the large amount of freedom that the projects and
>  > their
>  > >  communities have, how much damage can the Foundation do?
>  >
>  > Well, they took take away that freedom and then do lots of damage. I
>  > don't think they ever would, but it is within their power.
>  >
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > foundation-l mailing list
>  > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>  > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>  >
>  _______________________________________________
>  foundation-l mailing list
>  foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>