[Foundation-l] 10 thoughts on how to improve the quality of Swedish Wikipedia
David Gerard
dgerard at gmail.com
Wed Mar 12 12:34:19 UTC 2008
On 12/03/2008, Lennart Guldbrandsson <wikihannibal at gmail.com> wrote:
> ===Thought number one: delete the bad articles===
> I want to begin with a controversial proposal. It was controversial on dewp
> and the result there is still not totally clear, but I think that it may be
> good to start with a jolt.
> The proposal is to '''remove all bad articles'''. Bad articles come in many
> forms: stubs and substubs, articles with low real content (e.g. peacock and
> weasel terms), articles without proper language, articles that are
> confusing, lists that can never be completed, etc, etc. By deleting them we
> won't have a [[:Category:Wikipedia maintenance|maintenance page]] that's
> always full of things to do and has become a constant guilty conscience,
> rather than a project which some time will be more or less fulfilled.
> How would this be done? Well, the active users in a particular topic, for
> example a [[:Wikipedia:WikiProject|project]] or a
> [[:Wikipedia:Portal|portal]] (in other words: people who are interested),
> regularly go through "their" categories and weed out the worst articles -
> ''of course, they should enhance the articles they can". Enhancements are
> naturally better, but in many instances it would take such a long time that
> it's better to simply remove the articles.
> '''Summary:''' This deletion proposal would lead to svwp downsizing the
> article count. We could even go below 250,000 articles. But think of it like
> this: what kind of press release we could issue! "Wikipedia takes out all
> garbage."
This approach has already led to severe public relations problems for
en:wp, including a writeup in The Economist.
It also implies the live, working wiki is a finished polished product,
which kills working on it. en:wp has 2 million articles, but there's
at least 20 million topics that would be covered but aren't yet if you
just include all towns and state-level politicians.
- d.
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list