[Foundation-l] Muhammad

[White Cat]

Ah was reverted almost instantly

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Depiction_of_Jesus&diff=197254354&oldid=197253025

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:48 PM, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Images will not be deleted from commons for religious reasons. That I can
> guarantee. Their presentation on wikipedia can be avoided.
>
> We do not want galleries on wikipedia, that is what commons is for. This
> for example can be a valid compromise.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depiction_of_Jesus shows a few examples,
> which I will now move to commons as per the above reason.
>
>   - White Cat
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Wily D <wilydoppelganger at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Whitworth
> > <wknight8111 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Oldak Quill <oldakquill at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >  >  If we edited the image (per 1), we'd hardly be representing the
> > work
> > >  >  of art without bias and we wouldn't be representing the artwork
> > >  >  neutrally.
> > >
> > >  I agree with you entirely, I don't think that the first option is a
> > >  good one for us.
> > >
> > >  --Andrew Whitworth
> > >
> > >
> > Indeed, one editor or another created a modified version of Muhammad
> > Kaaba 1315 with the face blurred, and the comprimise was pretty
> > soundly rejected.  I believe the image is still on commons though.
> >
> > WilyD
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
>
>