[Foundation-l] Statement to the Associated Press

[Nathan]

Uh, what records are you talking about? All of Jimbo's personal e-mails? Do
you want his bank statements, too? A top 10 website is going to attract a
lot of strange claims, and the Foundation and associated people don't need
to release a barrage of responses and records to each one - or they'd be
doing nothing else. Seriously - every new claim shouldn't be viewed as an
opportunity to paint the organization as neglectful, secretive and
anti-community. If you really want to feel like an insider, maybe that eBay
auction hasn't finished yet.

Nathan

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Andrew Whitworth <wknight8111 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> What also wouldn't be a good idea is the same kind of secrecy and
> silence that people have been complaining about for months. If you act
> like every other company in the world, you're going to run into the
> same kinds of problems. There is always forgiveness to be had if
> people are honest about their mistakes. On the other hand, if things
> were truly "transparent" as people seem to claim, then finding the
> necessary proof to debunk these accusations should be a simple matter
> of searching through old records. Make all the truth known and keep
> all your information in the public eye, and you don't need to defend
> against anything, sling any mud, or suffer any unsubstantiated
> allegations.
>
> --Andrew Whitworth
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>