[Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales in the news

[Screamer]

Andrew Whitworth wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Screamer <scream at datascreamer.com> wrote:
>   
>> Philippe Beaudette wrote:
>>  > --------------------------------------------------
>>  > From: "Anthony" <wikimail at inbox.org>
>>  > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 5:24 PM
>>  >> I don't think I can chalk this up as "old stuff" as long as people
>>  >> involved in the foundation keep lying to and/or misleading the public
>>  >> about it.  Sue's comments in particular I found very disturbing.
>>  > While I have never questioned anyone's right to reasonable discussion, your
>>  > implication that Sue is lying is way, way, WAY out of line.  Put up or shut
>>  > up.  Call her a liar, or don't, but either way your emails are headed
>>  > straight for my trash-can.
>>  I have to concur here, and suggest moderation here as well, if the
>>  continues.
>>     
>
> I hate to rain on the parade, but Anthony didn't actually call Sue a
> liar here. He said that her statement was "disturbing", but that isn't
> the same as saying that she's a liar.
>
> --Andrew Whitworth
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>   
You are correct, thank you for clarifying... however, the entire tone of 
the message was in need of scrubbing before the poster hit the send 
button.  I don't think any message where the foundation is accused of 
misleading the public (et cetera) would be conducive to academic 
discussion on foundation-l.  Especially when the OP forgot, or does not 
have evidence to support that statement.  So my statement, as of now... 
stands.


./scream