[Foundation-l] Voting suffrage criteria (established members should be able to vote)

[Jon]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Aphaia wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:33 AM, Jon <scream at datascreamer.com> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Colleagues,
>>
>>
>> I'm concerned.  I'll start off by saying I'm not sore, just concerned.
>> I'll use my personal experience to illustrate the larger problem.
>>
>> The elections require an account to have so many edits to gain
>> eligibility to vote.  Now, I believe the intent was to be sure that
>> prior to voting, members are established.  My previous account, which is
>> established, has enough edits. The password is scrambled.   I think
>> everyone knows I'm established.  My enwiki "NonvocalScream" does not
>> meet criteria.  The account is unified, and is my permanent account is
>> not eligible on any project... yet.
> 
> I know you as NonvocalScream since very recent, just because he
> annoyed me on IRC every night just when I was going to bed, on the
> thing I've noted I will never deal with on such a way and urge to
> submit their requests on the wiki.  I do not know your previous
> account.
> Not everyone therefore recognize you as an established user. Q.E.D.
> 
> I would like to esteem your feeling but have seen many similar
> unconvincing arguments when I served as an Election Official.
> You are better to seek more robust argument, I suppose.
> 
> For your information I have 2K+ edits on English Wikipedia since 2004
> and active some areas.
> 

?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIXxU76+ro8Pm1AtURAlcXAJ9CZ7FNIxFGCYTwtw2nbuYRWT0VCQCfdHhi
30ORTT0v6hiz4Gg2za08GzI=
=ee/v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----